3 ms·
> the economic model of the company is partly based on the ads personalization. Therefore, it is of its utmost responsibility to comply with the obligations on
by dennisgorelik 8y ago
> the economic model of the company is partly based on the ads personalization. Therefore, it is of its utmost responsibility to comply with the obligations on the matter.
"Therefore" reasoning works in the opposite direction than CNIL bureaucrats claim.
If Google is known for ads personalization, then:
1) Users who decided using Google services should imply that Google will try to personalize their ads by default.
2) In order to "comply with obligation" to deliver ads personalization, Google should turn on "ads personalization" by default.
- rippeltippel 8y ago> If Google is known for ads personalization... If you ask 100 random people what is Google for, how many people do you think will answer "ads personalization"? My prediction is "close to 0%". Google's "About" page states: "Our mission is to organise the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful". No mention of personalization involved. Therefore, Google is NOT known for ads personalization.
- dennisgorelik 8y agoA correct question to "100 random people" would be "Does Google do ads personalization". My guess is that 70 people would not even know what "ads personalization" is. Out of remaining 30 people, 28 would correctly claim that Google does ads personalization.