5 ms·
E.g. on page 7 of the paper where the head is cut off in the "ours" picture and less so in the "HED" picture, or the helicopter is similar or worse in quality t
by ximeng 8y ago
E.g. on page 7 of the paper where the head is cut off in the "ours" picture and less so in the "HED" picture, or the helicopter is similar or worse in quality to the "gPb" picture.
- jnbiche 8y agoSure, it's not 100%. They included those images to illustrate some challenges that they ran into (negative space and low value boundaries, not surprising given their relatively small data set). But the ones that they open with are dramatically better than HED.
- ximeng 8y agoHmm, I'm getting downvoted, but even the opening ones look arguable to me, e.g. in the hotel room on the first page the lamp shade and cushion near the sofa don't look great. Some of the HED artifacts could be improved with some post processing I imagine (as they do later). The dogs are significantly better on page 6. Looks to me like there are some things they are doing better, but still a way to go. Difficult to tell with the small number of sample images.
- jnbiche 8y agoI didn't downvote, but I still see a significant difference between HED and the author's algorithm. But you're correct, it is difficult to make a confident judgment given the small number of sample images.