3 ms·
I thought Razib Kahn also had a response worth reading. This is all out of line with my previous impression of the New York Times as a respectable paper. Is t
by Symmetry 8y ago
I thought Razib Kahn also had a response worth reading. This is all out of line with my previous impression of the New York Times as a respectable paper. Is the new era of virality driven news taking its toll on them? My impression is that they wouldn't have published this 10 years ago but perhaps I'm being naive?
https://www.gnxp.com/WordPress/2019/01/19/194105/ https://www.gnxp.com/WordPress/2019/01/19/194105/
- racists 8y agoThe New York Times is definitely run by racists. It’s just a constant flood of race baiting from them, on a daily basis at this point, and they just don’t know how to control themselves.
- racistNYT 8y agoThe New York Times is just constantly pumping out racially charged articles, every day. You can hellban me, but it’s true.
- barry-cotter 8y agoYou’re being naive. Things were never better, it’s just that we live in an era when disseminating the counter narrative is easier than it used to be. Walter Duranty’s Pulitzer was never revoked. He worked for the NYT as Moscow Burea Chief while the Holodmor, the Ukrainian famine was happening and didn’t cover it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Duranty https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Duranty > What Duranty knew and when > It was clear, meanwhile, from Duranty's comments to others that he was fully aware of the scale of the calamity. In 1934 he privately reported to the British embassy in Moscow that as many as 10 million people may have died, directly or indirectly, from famine in the Soviet Union in the previous year.[25] > Both British intelligence[26] and American engineer Zara Witkin (1900–1940),[27] who worked in the USSR from 1932 to 1934,[28] confirmed that Duranty knowingly misrepresented information about the nature and scale of the famine. > There are some indications that Duranty's deliberate misdirection concerning the famine may have been the result of duress. Conquest believed Duranty was being blackmailed over his sexual proclivities.[29]