3 ms·
it's more just the huge risk right? so many factors become part of the threat model, when you could stick to the physical lock, and really limit it. https://t
by who-knows95 8y ago
it's more just the huge risk right?
so many factors become part of the threat model, when you could stick to the physical lock, and really limit it.
https://twitter.com/internetofshit?lang=en https://twitter.com/internetofshit?lang=en is a pretty good example.
you could make a rfid chip reader part of your lock, but even that has weakness.
http://www.astclock.com/astclocks-blog/advantages-of-rfid-door-locks/ http://www.astclock.com/astclocks-blog/advantages-of-rfid-do...
tldr: limit your damn threat model/inconvenience.
- Thorrez 8y agoI don't think security of entry to the apartment is the main concern (because most locks can be picked fairly easily, and criminals force doors regardless of lock). I think privacy, network security, and availability are the bigger issues.
- who-knows95 8y agowell, i do agree, the network and availability are my main issues. if a criminal is going to break you door, it's going to happen. but, i think people would be more suspicious of someone picking a door lock, rather then waving a Chip and the door allowing them access. i know, alot of hotels weren't surprised to learn their room doors were amazing weak. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/hotel-hack-digital-lock-door-system-fsecure-assa-abloy https://www.wired.co.uk/article/hotel-hack-digital-lock-door... if you want a good physical lock the ANSI Grading System is a good place to start.