Yes, that's actually what I meant to say.. couldn't remember the right terminology at the time. The point stands though, I think.. the number "99.6%" for identi

Yes, that's actually what I meant to say.. couldn't remember the right terminology at the time. The point stands though, I think.. the number "99.6%" for identical twins isn't measuring the same as "98.5%" (or so) for humans vs chimps.