Speaking from user space that has G65 macro-b option, not machine tool builder (sudo) space. >I think of G-code as ASM. >Eventually, something actuates a serv

Speaking from user space that has G65 macro-b option, not machine tool builder (sudo) space. >I think of G-code as ASM. >Eventually, something actuates a servo, and servos don’t understand iteration. I think of it more as an intermediate language. Interpreted on the CNC control and JIT compiled to whatever the RT system needs for servo control. >Do you agree eventually something with g-codes level of detail must exist (even if it’s just unspecified internal commands)? It does exist and a strict subset with enough primitives to bootstrap an application VM should continue to exist. >If so, do you agree you’re just advocating for that layer to be part of the machine? I am advocating for a DSL one layer up to be part of the CNC machine with support offline in say the JVM. I want to answer this question, “how do we deploy MBE?” https://www.nist.gov/news-events/events/2019/04/model-based-enterprise-summit-2019 https://www.nist.gov/news-events/events/2019/04/model-based-... The answer needs to be a single digital file that can render real parts and virtual parts. Why not?