3 ms·
>100% of those that couldn't do it are not qualified candidates. OP stated nearly the inverse: that 90% of those who can do it are qualified candidates.
by unclebucknasty 8y ago
>100% of those that couldn't do it are not qualified candidates.
OP stated nearly the inverse: that 90% of those who can do it are qualified candidates.
- dkersten 8y agoSo you discard 100% of those who can’t do it, knowing that 90% of the rest are qualified.
- unclebucknasty 8y agoThat's a different argument that gets us back to the original premise I disputed, so you're now just begging the question with numbers. That is, your numbers are only valid if I accept the premise that I'm rejecting. I don't believe that 90% of people who can answer such a basic question are qualified.