4 ms·
You have mistaken the development version (V0.2) for the final version. A subsequent graph in page 13 shows that there had been indeed a big improvement over CD
by lifthrasiir 8y ago
You have mistaken the development version (V0.2) for the final version. A subsequent graph in page 13 shows that there had been indeed a big improvement over CDS.
- garmaine 8y agoYou misread the post, as you are both saying the same thing.
- lifthrasiir 8y agoI guess I'm not good at reading nuances ;-) As you can see from the originally linked plot, B612 V0.2 is not universally better than Verdana (say, t is much worse). The original paper also states (p. 13) that the plot was used to guide the development, so they clearly knew that V0.2 is not as optimal. Henceforth I have assumed that the OP thinks B612 tried to optimize easier bits (explicit) and did it badly (implied). I should have been overly sarcastic...