4 ms·
Not having read the paper to which to parent referred, but I might be able to shed some light on this... Let us describe the state of the previous two tosses a
by fpalmans 8y ago
Not having read the paper to which to parent referred, but I might be able to shed some light on this...
Let us describe the state of the previous two tosses as XX, with X being either H or T. If --(X)--> describes the next toss, we can describe the transition between states as follows:
HH --(H)--> HH
HH --(T)--> HT
and
HT --(H)--> TH
HT --(T)--> TT
etc.
If we are waiting for HHT, starting from state HH
HH --(H)--> HH : or, we get back to state HH
HH --(T)--> "HHT" : HHT is found and we stop searching
as opposed to waiting for HHH
HH --(H)--> "HHH" : HHH is found, and we stop
HH --(T)--> HT : and we are in a new state which requires at least two more --(H)--> in sequence before we return to state HH.
I hope this helps.
EDIT: reformatting & typo