Nope. Yes, the Wikipedia link says 20 um isotropic resolution, but that means 20 um per direction. 20 um is a unit of length, while 20 um ^ 3, a unit of volume.

Nope. Yes, the Wikipedia link says 20 um isotropic resolution, but that means 20 um per direction. 20 um is a unit of length, while 20 um ^ 3, a unit of volume. If it were about volume, you'd be correct. Also, I just looked at the paper [1] and here it says: > To generate a data set with isotropic resolution, we down-scaled all images to 20 µm by 20 µm to match the section thickness of 20 µm. So that confirms the 20 um per direction, no? Edit: oh no, I just see that I wrote 1 um above, not 20. Not that 2.71 is correct but I guess that's what confused you. Corrected. Thanks! [1]: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.899.2730&rep=rep1&type=pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.899...