Part of the issue is that most of the arguments about flat earth are easy to me in layman's terms and hard to debunk without going deep mathematically. And the

Part of the issue is that most of the arguments about flat earth are easy to me in layman's terms and hard to debunk without going deep mathematically. And there are lots of them, see this famous example https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ax_YpQsy88 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ax_YpQsy88 Now let's assume that a flat eaether believer is lacking the sort of knowledge required to instance why these "proofs" are wrong, how you going to debate them with the knowledge gap? You have to either fill that first or convert all your arguments into layman terms, making it extremely costly and time consuming. And so their view goes unchallenged.