I see a number of people reacting negatively to the 'God' section. I also had an issue with it. Let me explain why I found it odd: He spends most of the article

I see a number of people reacting negatively to the 'God' section. I also had an issue with it. Let me explain why I found it odd: He spends most of the article asserting his points by tying them to real examples or at least ones that resemble common events we all see. He then launches into moralizing with God as his touchstone "But God is different. Because he has an infinite mind". No, I don't think he was talking about Eisenstein's God or some other abstraction. I don't disagree with his broader points about how you should measure your worth, but he could have made them in a much more effective way by just asking the reader to imagine the outcome of a life lived for only yourself.