For 25+ years, he got a lot of fame and fortune from some sophomoric, simplistic observations. His thinking is so simplistic that he fails to see how simplisti

For 25+ years, he got a lot of fame and fortune from some sophomoric, simplistic observations. His thinking is so simplistic that he fails to see how simplistic it is. Then on "confused", well, he is simplistic and, in particular, concludes that the world is as simplistic as his observations, concludes that the universe and God are nearly that simplistic, so is willing to believe his stuff about God. E.g., his description of the roles of data are absurdly simplistic. Look, Clayton guy, you have not even started even to scratch the surface of the nature, role, power, value, importance of data. Also Clayton, your view of innovation is too simplistic and fails to cover all the more important cases of innovation funded since 1940 by the US DoD, NSF, NIH, NASA, DoE, and more and the work of, say, Viterbi at QUALCOMM, and the rest of the STEM fields.