4 ms·
> Anytime an article about "climate change" uses words like "could" "might" "potentially" and this one "risks" we are in speculation, not demonstration land. D
by EForEndeavour 8y ago
> Anytime an article about "climate change" uses words like "could" "might" "potentially" and this one "risks" we are in speculation, not demonstration land.
Do you not read a lot of scientific journals? Also, the article uses none of the qualifier words you listed except "risk" in an appropriate manner, in the subtitle. The title is "Europe’s Most Important River Is Running Dry." Is that demonstrative enough for you?
- ThomPete 8y agoThe header is not important as that's used to draw you in and will be the most sensationalist. What you want to look for is in the actual article and there "risks" is used which is the only important word you need to look for.