3 ms·
I think I see where you're coming from, but at the same time we shouldn't establish a precedent that makes it even easier for companies to hide behind some name
by doktrin 8y ago
I think I see where you're coming from, but at the same time we shouldn't establish a precedent that makes it even easier for companies to hide behind some named scapegoat. The decision was carried out in IBM's name, and IBM bears responsibility for it.
- WalterSear 8y agoPorque no los dos?
- ambicapter 8y ago> we shouldn't establish a precedent that makes it even easier for companies to hide behind some named scapegoat. As opposed to just hiding behind the corporate charter?
- doktrin 8y agoNot sure what kind of answer you expect. The existence of one oft-used loophole is a reason to create another?