> Dynamic languages as a result of their "dynamicness" tend to allow much better expression of control flow when compared to static languages. That may be, but

> Dynamic languages as a result of their "dynamicness" tend to allow much better expression of control flow when compared to static languages. That may be, but I'll be damned if Golang's verbose type casting hasn't saved me from some bugs over the years. Also, I think there's an argument for type declarations being expressive in their own right. I like seeing what types a function receives and returns. It's a quick jumping off point when trying to understand what the function does.