4 ms·
Read the article, or read it again. She was a regular customer and didn’t acquire “dates”. They knew she wasn’t an escort.
by chrisbennet 8y ago
Read the article, or read it again. She was a regular customer and didn’t acquire “dates”. They knew she wasn’t an escort.
- lazyjones 8y agoThat's her side of the story. We don't know what the management saw, what they based their judgement on, whether they even considered her an escort or had this policy for single women in order to prevent other problems.
- chrisbennet 8y ago” had this policy for single women in order to prevent other problems.” Right there, that’s sexual discrimination! You can’t have one rule for single men and another for single women.
- onetimemanytime 8y ago>>So when doing an optics inventory on their patrons they treated the single woman in a patriarchal fashion: they automatically objectified, sexualised, put her (me) in a box – the treasure chest of pleasure. Ummm...after 4 years of going there. I have no dog in this race just don't buy the worst thing here. Maybe they misjudged, maybe she lead them to believe otherwise...whatever. But maybe they just don't want people bothered at the bar by the opposite sex (or whatever they enjoy.) Some let ladies drink free to attract guys to the bar, some don't, and maybe pull the trigger too fast. The callgirl thing is tricky. No one knows for sure unless they're there when you ask for the money? What if...she behaved like one? Maybe she was looking to meet a guy not have sex for money, but then, they judged it.