4 ms·
>Can't you make this argument against any public service? >The compelling cost argument, IMO, is that a subway system could offer more mobility at the same pri
by romwell 8y ago
>Can't you make this argument against any public service?
>The compelling cost argument, IMO, is that a subway system could offer more mobility at the same price point.
So, yes and yes?
- closeparen 8y agoIf the principle is that we should not spend other people's money on transportation, or that transportation users should pay the full cost of their mileage, then we shouldn't build subways either. At least not at public expense.