5 ms·
Disagreeing with something doesn't entitle employees to storm out of meetings, unless there was intentional malice. While family doesn't necessitate children to
by writepub 8y ago
Disagreeing with something doesn't entitle employees to storm out of meetings, unless there was intentional malice. While family doesn't necessitate children to be a part of it, neither is the implication that a "high probability exists that families have children", offensive enough to storm out, act out, throw a fit, etc.
At what point will Google realize that every tantrum doesn't deserve a corporate change, some just necessitate the employees to "grow-up" enough to live in a world that's not a 100% ideal.
FYI googling "family definition" returns "a group consisting of parents and children living together in a household". How genuine can this outage really be?
- lern_too_spel 8y agoThe article made it sound like the complaint was about the use of "family friendly" at a company-wide meeting. I don't know how it would even be possible to storm out of such a meeting, when any meeting with more than 100 people will have people coming and going completely unnoticed. It sounds like sensational journalism from The Daily Caller.