3 ms·
I see so many people talking about how irrelevant algorithm skills are for real world coding, and lots of allegations of age discrimination. I see the validity
by whiddershins 8y ago
I see so many people talking about how irrelevant algorithm skills are for real world coding, and lots of allegations of age discrimination.
I see the validity of both points, and I’m sure they are true.
But people, please, some perspective.
The author spent a couple of months studying and practicing material in their spare time and got offers from top companies in the comfortable 6 figures.
That happens in no other industry, ever.
Look at what lawyers, structural engineers, accountants, and most especially architects ... not to mention the obvious one: doctors, go through to be qualified to make good money.
The author presumably graduated with a bs, worked for pay for 2.5 years, did some online learning, and makes a great living?
A doctor would still be in (very expensive) school.
I suspect there’s an element of IQ-ish testing with these puzzles and it sucks if your brain doesn’t work that way and you are permanently excluded as a result of that.
But if you have the capacity but can’t be bothered to learn a bunch of material over a fairly short time frame to handle an interview, why should these companies want you? You obviously just don’t care that much, because the investment is tiny.
- pmorici 8y ago"got offers from top companies in the comfortable 6 figures." Maybe I missed it but I didn't see where he discussed what the offers were like compensation wise.
- vehementi 8y agoIt's more that the unfortunate reality is that programming is so amazingly powerful and relatively easy to do (i.e. compared to becoming a doctor or lawyer) and is so scalable that companies make so much money off developers that it's not a big deal to pay them six figures.