If you consider that the 200 years of record keeping we can rely on as fact, and then understand that the 200 years we have coverage for, just happen to be a re

If you consider that the 200 years of record keeping we can rely on as fact, and then understand that the 200 years we have coverage for, just happen to be a really extraordinary period, your question is needling at perhaps the least valuable detail. In fact, that detail is very obviously chosen for selfish reasons. What percentage of that detail (the proportion of humanty’s fault and blame in evident destruction) would you say is selfish, versus merely rationally skeptical?