3 ms·

> all I know is it's not in the 2.3.36 Linux kernel, but btrfs is, so btrfs wins. I've been out of the Linux kernel loop for ages now, but isn't 2.3.36 over 1

by apgwoz 16y ago

> all I know is it's not in the 2.3.36 Linux kernel, but btrfs is, so btrfs wins. I've been out of the Linux kernel loop for ages now, but isn't 2.3.36 over 10 years old? Did they change the naming convention such that development kernels are 2.3 again? If so, why? Or, am I completely missing something?

pmjordan 16y ago
Must be a typo for 2.6.36.
- apgwoz 16y ago
  I assumed that too, but questioned it anyway.
  - JshWright 16y ago
    You assumed that... yet in your list of possible reasons, a simple typo wasn't listed?
    - apgwoz 16y ago
      Listing that as a reason would result in multiple people agreeing that it was a typo and nothing more. If it wasn't a typo, it'd have been overlooked.