4 ms·
Wow, that's remarkable. As an aside, your work on numerical cohomology appears to have been useful for a new result pertaining to lattices. Given the authors o
by throwawaymath 8y ago
Wow, that's remarkable.
As an aside, your work on numerical cohomology appears to have been useful for a new result pertaining to lattices. Given the authors of the followup work it's likely helpful for the study of lattices in post-quantum cryptography.
- tprice7 8y agoAre you referring to the "An Inequality for Gaussians on Lattices" paper? They cite my paper, but it's to give an example of an application of their result (which I use), not because they built on it. But anyway, I think it's very fascinating that the people who discovered a key result that I needed for that paper, which could probably be best classified as arithmetic geometry, are mainly computer scientists!
- throwawaymath 8y agoAh, thanks for the clarification. The computer scientists who work on quantum computational complexity and post-quantum cryptography tend to be much more mathematical than the norm :)