2 ms·
Manually (as in manus, the hand) measuring your pulse while not at rest (sitting down, in a calm environment) is so error prone, it's almost useless. The only
by the_duke 8y ago
Manually (as in manus, the hand) measuring your pulse while not at rest (sitting down, in a calm environment) is so error prone, it's almost useless.
The only proper comparison would be with a chest strep, which are much more accurate.
Also, it really differs per person and how you wear the watch. Just wearing it a bit differently can change the results significantly.
Sweat also gets them messed up easily.
All reasons why, if you want accurate data for workouts, you should always use a chest strep. Even if they are much more awkward.
- sfilargi 8y agoAnecdotal, but I got an Apple Watch because I never liked the squeezing feeling of the chest strap of my Suunto. I put them to test for the first couple weeks and both at rest and while running the difference in the HR reported by both was less than 1bps.