3 ms·

At this point it should probably be illegal to call something "private" when there is no guarantee of protections.

• deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
• the_duke 8y ago
  Seems to have been a bug where some settings were reset accidentally. Of course this shouldn't happen, but I can see how something like this could easily slip through.
• woodrowbarlow 8y ago
  twitter uses the word "protected", only the article's author ever used the word "private".
  • sixothree 8y ago
    Was it really a good faith effort to make them protected?
    • scarejunba 8y ago
      Yes, it was a bug that revealed them.