4 ms·
My favourite example is Billings (http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/billings-touch/id343938310?mt=8 http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/billings-touch/id343938310?mt...
by haribilalic 16y ago
My favourite example is Billings (http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/billings-touch/id343938310?mt=8 http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/billings-touch/id343938310?mt...). It doesn't sell content like music or in-game credits, but features. The app is free, but if you want to send invoices via email or sync it with your Mac, it'll cost you $14.99.
- phlux 16y agoI personally don't like such "drug-dealer" models. Do you get to try the features out before paying for them? It would be disappointing if you liked the app, wanted a feature - then found that it didn't meet your expectations/requirements after purchase.
- chc 16y agoHow is that worse than if you'd had to pay for the whole app up-front? Your argument seems to be against paying at all, not against paying for additional features.
- haribilalic 16y agoThe other features are there from the start and the description in the App Store states that these two features cost extra. I don't see the big problem. Hell, you have to fork out $39.95 for the Mac app for one of these to even be useful. What's another $15?