3 ms·
Because that wasnt what their reply was about? I dont really get this style of steering a discussion: the idea that every reply needs to include a disclaimer a
by gammateam 8y ago
Because that wasnt what their reply was about?
I dont really get this style of steering a discussion: the idea that every reply needs to include a disclaimer about every differences and some insight into how the poster agrees or disagrees with those things as if checking a box. “Oh darn we cant villify the messenger now what are we going to do... well we can discredit them by highlighting why we cant question their stance on anything”
- friedman23 8y agoTheir reply was about normalizing the Cuban government's behavior towards pregnant women. > Acting like this is coersion is disingenuous This is a quote from the person I was responding to. If you don't understand how this is trying to normalize the behavior of a government there is no way I will convince you.
- gammateam 8y agoThey didnt address it at all. They added an addendum distinctly about a US policy. Your concern is that they were normalizing something that they didnt even talk about, solely because it didnt join in villifying Cuba just so you would continue reading. I dont really get that train of thought