3 ms·
I think concept spaces acquire a "shape" when we become familiar enough (I associate this with the idea of a subject "clicking"), and that creativity often invo
by beaconstudios 8y ago
I think concept spaces acquire a "shape" when we become familiar enough (I associate this with the idea of a subject "clicking"), and that creativity often involves realising the shape of different concept spaces are similar and thus ideas from one can apply to another. Furthermore, I believe these "shapes" exist as a metaphysical "truth", akin to platonic forms. I think it ties into how real-world problems can often be reduced to pure mathematical problems. I experience ideasthesia very strongly (often having strong, immediate instinctual reactions to e.g. how well new software features fit within the "shape" of the overall domain as well as having affinity or aversion to concepts for reasons I have to deduce later).
I'm not sure exactly what I'm trying to say, beyond "I think so, yeah". It's a super interesting area of exploration and either it hasn't been looked into enough, or I don't know the right words to look for. I can feel a thread linking concepts like mental models, systems theory, cybernetics, Christopher Alexander's work on pattern languages, and so on.
- pizza 8y agoCould be like a fourier transform of a semantic concept (pointer) (multi-)graph.. And as a behavior loop, attention/perception = solving some class of sparse problem in a very high dimensional space..
- thecupisblue 8y agoYou're on a good path, abstractions and concepts overlap a lot between seemingly different areas of reality.
- beaconstudios 8y agoYeah they do, and I'm interested in what we can do with that. I believe that accessible modelling could change the world in a lot of fundamental ways.