3 ms·
> We do have Wag's side of the story. No, you don't. You only have someone's claims about Wag's side of the story. It sounds authentic, but Internet is full w
by oldgradstudent 8y ago
> We do have Wag's side of the story.
No, you don't. You only have someone's claims about Wag's side of the story.
It sounds authentic, but Internet is full with authentic-sounding false stories.
- onion2k 8y agoIs it more likely that someone is lying on the internet about their dog being killed, with no one they know replying in the comments to call them out, or that a startup is catastrophically bad at PR and just basic human empathy? The principle of Occam's Razor applies here.
- oldgradstudent 8y agoYou are making inferences about the situation after hearing one side of the story. As reasonable as it is, it is still coming after hearing one side of the story. And no, Occam's razor does not apply.