3 ms·
Says someone whose clearly never tried to maintain production uptime :) Seriously, if you have responsibility for a large system (ie, think the GE network) - y
by privateSFacct 8y ago
Says someone whose clearly never tried to maintain production uptime :)
Seriously, if you have responsibility for a large system (ie, think the GE network) - you can take the AWS route - and uptime will be good, or you can do the backwards incompatible changes - and everyone will hate you. Seriously, just the printer DNS lookup clients / the email lookup clients / the amount of cruft in a big system is mind bending.
The other thing I'm not getting, your going to be doing DNS round trips to get to version match? DNS is on the critical path to web page response - I hope this is a joke. Put this into a hint in a recursive lookup or something so when I look up what DNS server handles abc.com I (can optionally) see what EDNS version that server supports? Or TXT field or something? Does the error returned say what is supported? Or will the client need to do multiple R/T's to find the correct version? That's can't be right - I'm not a DNS expert, but I'm not seeing the point of this approach.
- dagenix 8y agoYou must be a real delight to work with. None of your rant addressed my question at all - is what Route53 is doing standard practice, or, is it the unusual one?