3 ms·
> The value being created by the software would then be captured by those who would otherwise have had to pay You mean potentially sick people that might not h
by franciscop 8y ago
> The value being created by the software would then be captured by those who would otherwise have had to pay
You mean potentially sick people that might not have access to this diagnosis if the software was not open source? Some times Open Source and co is just to help others! Not everything is profit-motivated :)
- randlet 8y agoNot on the diagnostic side in this case but yes, open sourcing was both to help other cancer centres manage their QC data better and operate more efficiently as well as an attempt to attract others to contribute to the project.
- sl1ck731 8y agoThe original poster was commenting on trying to obtain revenue from the open source product of their creation. You are right that sometimes things are just to help others, but its meaningless here unless we are strictly talking about the initial creation and not the continued support of it as the poster is now trying to monetize it. Not that either is bad or good, but you're having your cake and eating it too.