3 ms·
I have to concur that Agenda Item 109[1] (Countering the use of information and communications technologies for criminal purposes), is vague as feck. I'm looki
by renholder 8y ago
I have to concur that Agenda Item 109[1] (Countering the use of information and communications technologies for criminal purposes), is vague as feck.
I'm looking forward to the report from the Secretary-General, to get a better understanding on the scope of their intent: Unlawful as per the UN or unlawful as per the member nations.
[1] - http://undocs.org/A/C.3/73/L.9/Rev.1 http://undocs.org/A/C.3/73/L.9/Rev.1
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- sbov 8y agoInterestingly, from the article too: > Opposition to the resolution came mainly from Australia, Canada, the European Union and the US.
- Fellshard 8y agoVague is the name of the UN game.
- lstodd 8y agoWhat does "unlawful per UN" mean?
- reaperducer 8y agoIt means if there’s a violation, a bunch of bureaucrats and guys in blue helmets show up and form committees to decide what color paper should be used to send a very strongly worded letter.