3 ms·

> Editors & IDE mentions only Sublime and Vim...hardly professional.

• pleasecalllater 8y ago
  You can make a PR and add your ideas. Really.
  • komali2 8y ago
    Too late, I already did ;)
• pdpi 8y ago
  Incomplete? Biased towards a certain style of editor? Sure. "Hardly professional"? What's not professional about either of those?
  • sydd 8y ago
    That is seems more like a personal preference list than a comprehensive list used at work. It takes 5 mins to google IDE market share, e.g. check out the results of Stack Overflow surveys.
    • pdpi 8y ago
      I think you misunderstood the point of the repo, then. Personally, I could list off the top of my head several likely candidates for the top editors and IDEs, but I don't have anything useful to say about most of them, because I don't use them. I fully expect the author is in the exact same position. You're absolutely right that the list is not comprehensive, and it's probably the author's own personal preferences. But if he uses mostly those editors, what's he to do? Just list off a few more editors/IDEs with no links to any useful resources, when the whole point of the repo is to have actual resources you can read? How would having a header saying "IntelliJ" or "XCode" or "Visual Studio" make that list better? How would just adding a random link for some blog post about any of those help, if the list's author can't vouch for their validity? It's overall just best to put in what you know, and leave the rest to PRs.