I'm not sure what reason you have in mind. FSF and OSI are split on "private changes": whether a copyleft license can require distribution of changes. OSI app

I'm not sure what reason you have in mind. FSF and OSI are split on "private changes": whether a copyleft license can require distribution of changes. OSI approved Plan 9, RPL, and Open Watcom, all of which require this in at least some scenarios. FSF rejects those license. I don't understand why FSF takes that position. More on that: https://writing.kemitchell.com/2018/09/17/Private-Changes.html https://writing.kemitchell.com/2018/09/17/Private-Changes.ht...