> Where's the prudery in Cindy's article? "Your covers aren’t all that friendly to women on a regular basis..." This implies that showing women with a sexual

> Where's the prudery in Cindy's article? "Your covers aren’t all that friendly to women on a regular basis..." This implies that showing women with a sexual bent is somehow "unfriendly" to women, or that it limits them to being sexual objects, neither of which is true, and both of which are products of our obsessions and shames regarding sexuality. > Actually no. Wired and YC both have < 10% women, far less than the broader tech field -- or society as a whole. I have to assume you are trying to contradict me, although your statement doesn't seem to. The proportion of women in tech is higher than the proportion of women among tech leaders, which is what I was referring to. This is likely because women don't seem as likely to play the founder lottery.