>> You will always find people who you can argue unfairly benefit from a redistribution scheme. > A redistribution scheme is inherently unfair. I would love t

>> You will always find people who you can argue unfairly benefit from a redistribution scheme. > A redistribution scheme is inherently unfair. I would love to see what a strong defense of this looks like, that doesn't wind up having all kinds of weird and probably unintended implications. I can't think of one. Best I can do is to define terms such that it becomes tautological.