That’s what I love about Lomborg’s argument. The Global Warming alarmists get by with weak science by saying their preliminary findings appear to be right and

That’s what I love about Lomborg’s argument. The Global Warming alarmists get by with weak science by saying their preliminary findings appear to be right and there’s no time to debate any further because the world will end if we don’t act now. Lomborg essentially bypasses the science part of that argument and attacks the real issue which is the urgency claim. In doing so he takes away the reasons for politicization of the issue and puts the focus back on scientific study of the problem.