6 ms·
That Perens quote refers specifically to Sunil Deshpande's article about the SSPL and Open Source, not to the SSPL itself. But it's not far off either way… The
by latk 8y ago
That Perens quote refers specifically to Sunil Deshpande's article about the SSPL and Open Source, not to the SSPL itself. But it's not far off either way…
The reaction on the OSI's license-review list is more varied. Lawrence Rosen and Ken Mitchell argue that the license should be approved. Everyone else is criticizing that it clearly violates the spirit of Open Source software (no discrimination against fields of endeavour!), and that the license is too broad and too vague in the critical section (Rosen agrees with the latter part). Carlo Piana points out that the goal of the license seems to be to create so much legal uncertainty that any serious user would be forced to buy a proprietary license from MongoDB.
- dankohn1 8y agoThanks for the insightful summary.
- kemitchell 8y agoI also criticize the way SSPL was drafted. The legal talent they have can do far better. The choice to patch AGPL cuffed them. Here's me announcing an attempt at a plain-language, SSPL-style license from scratch: https://writing.kemitchell.com/2019/01/12/Shared-Component-License.html https://writing.kemitchell.com/2019/01/12/Shared-Component-L... The latest license text is at: https://github.com/kemitchell/shared-component-license https://github.com/kemitchell/shared-component-license