5 ms·
>Because reading about content is self-selected disclosure of interest, the NYT already has all the information they need to target me — they know I read politi
by komali2 8y ago
>Because reading about content is self-selected disclosure of interest, the NYT already has all the information they need to target me — they know I read politics, and when I’m in that context.
This seems to me what "targeted advertising" should mean - NYT says "for all routes of nytimes.com/politics, show political ads. If it's local news, open it up to classifieds for local business." Etc.
If someone's on the page, is that not enough information?
- jethro_tell 8y agoTo show the ad to the consumer? I'd say yes. To sell the ad, when google is selling hyper informative profiles down the road. Maybe not. Not that people who buy ads or keywords or whatever have the best idea of who they should sell it to
- seem_2211 8y agoBut also, if it's general interest that makes sense as well. Say an ad for BestBuy while browsing the NYT. That's one of the benefits of well trafficked sites - you can reach a pretty wide swath of the population.
- kiriakasis 8y agoIn this sense I would like it if site took advertisement more seriously. Asking feedback, allowing personalization, selecting a few "endorsed" ads (as a quick and cheap Boolean review). For Google and Facebook it doesn't make sense, but for a newspaper i would expect some selection on the ads they show.
- nine_k 8y agoBTW Stackoverflow does many of these things with their ads.