these are strong points. i wonder if there can be some kind of (potentially algorithmic) metric that tells us how much of an article is unsubstantiated? we alr

these are strong points. i wonder if there can be some kind of (potentially algorithmic) metric that tells us how much of an article is unsubstantiated? we already have opinion pieces and editorials as categories. can we use such categorizations to indicate some measure of trustworthiness of a given article?