4 ms·
I saw this on a thread on Reddit: >The lawyers royally fucked up. >All they had to do was provide proof that McDonalds sells Big Macs. Their evidence was sign
by pedrocx486 8y ago
I saw this on a thread on Reddit:
>The lawyers royally fucked up.
>All they had to do was provide proof that McDonalds sells Big Macs. Their evidence was signed affidavits by high ranking board members, advertisements, a Wikipedia entry and a few others of a similar vein.
>Problem was they failed to provide any evidence that McDonalds actually sells Big Macs, just that Big Macs exist and judges really don’t like “everybody knows” being treated as evidence.
- vertline3 8y ago"All they had to do was provide proof that McDonalds sells Big Macs." I still think that seems odd. Seems the judge can say "I need proof these are sold" and force them to show weekly sales receipts?