5 ms·
It's one thing to have an imbalance of sheer number, which may well be a reflection of reality. It's another thing entirely to make 90% of the women you do dep
by showerst 16y ago
It's one thing to have an imbalance of sheer number, which may well be a reflection of reality.
It's another thing entirely to make 90% of the women you do depict into sexbots. Putting ugly people on the covers doesn't sell magazines, but they could at least make some effort to depict reality.
- kiba 16y agoMen like beautiful sexy women. Sexbots? Who would think of women as a bunch of automation, unable to think for herself, with no interests of her own, with no agenda of her own as sexy? It is not.
- crux_ 16y agoIf the picture of a body and not a person, "sexbot" seems an appropriate term. Perhaps the distinction is too subtle for you?
- epochwolf 16y ago> Who would think of women as a bunch of automation, unable to think for herself, with no interests of her own, with no agenda of her own as sexy? It is not. I can think of a few people that seem to think that way in the way they talk about women.
- pyre 16y ago> they could at least make some effort to > depict reality. A cover story titled: "You will most likely die alone, with no accomplishments to your name, and no one will remember you."
- mfukar 16y agoBut, that'll sell like crazy, dood!
- Tichy 16y ago"It's another thing entirely to make 90% of the women you do depict into sexbots" Could it be just your imagination that turns those women on the covers into sex bots?