From a response: > "naming and shaming" is an option ... but ... Stack Exchange is not the platform to name and shame on. This might be a better place for tha

From a response: > "naming and shaming" is an option ... but ... Stack Exchange is not the platform to name and shame on. This might be a better place for that. Shaming seems to be an appropriate response if the allegations are correct. While a legal response would likely cost more than the damages, it could be a service to readers to warn us. The company allegedly at fault is of course free to reply here as well. Mr. Kendall, who did it?