3 ms·
What if I told you the NYT has been doing "untargeted" advertising for 150 years? Besides if you advertise in the NYT you ARE technically targeting people: nam
by Tsubasachan 8y ago
What if I told you the NYT has been doing "untargeted" advertising for 150 years?
Besides if you advertise in the NYT you ARE technically targeting people: namely NYT readers. Thats a demographic right there. And a lucrative one.
- snowwrestler 8y agoNational newspapers have several ways to target print ads: - Calendar: You can buy an ad for one day, a whole week, the weekend, just Sunday, etc. - Section: You can run your ad in the Travel section instead of Sports. - Region: For national papers, you can have your ad printed in only one region--for example buying a full-page NY Times ad that is only printed in the papers printed in DC. - Edition: Papers use to run a morning edition and an updated afternoon and evening edition. Some papers now produce a free thin version that is handed out free to commuters. Big papers have also long offered ad campaign management services, where you work with their staff to optimize a campaign (including creative sometimes) to target the audience you want.
- tivert 8y ago> National newspapers have several ways to target print ads: Broad content-based targeting kind of targeting we or the GDPR is talking about. The issue here are individually targeted ads that are only possible with computerized ad delivery.
- x0x0 8y agoThe NYT is one of the premier ad properties just because of exactly that: the demographics of their readers. Breaking google ads works out great for the very tippy-top of premier properties like the nyt. It doesn't work out well for non-premier properties.
- mrweasel 8y ago>Besides if you advertise in the NYT you ARE technically targeting people: namely NYT readers At that point wouldn't all ads be targeted, to some extend? The only sites that would be in "trouble" is massive news aggregations sites.