3 ms·
We don't know. I'm going to tell you a short story, though. Rumor has it that KMS[1] was developed entirely because a deep-pocketed RH customer was annoyed tha
by myWindoonn 8y ago
We don't know. I'm going to tell you a short story, though.
Rumor has it that KMS[1] was developed entirely because a deep-pocketed RH customer was annoyed that their workstations showed a fraction of a second of the boot/init log, and wanted a more seamlessly-graphical boot.
This feature was not universally welcomed by the kernel community. It excluded BSD cousins and frustrated nVidia and AMD/ATI. I remember standing next to the DRM/KMS maintainer while Linus yelled at us.
RH absolutely will interact with upstream on behalf of their customers. They don't just "open a GH issue"; they present designs, code, rationale, and evidence to upstream. I wonder whether this is something that Oracle does, but it doesn't sound like it.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Rendering_Manager#Kernel_Mode_Setting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Rendering_Manager#Kerne...