3 ms·
If you go by these links, Java programmers (87k) equally well off as Cobol programmers (87k) and both are better off than Ruby programmers (84k). If you really
by brehaut 16y ago
If you go by these links, Java programmers (87k) equally well off as Cobol programmers (87k) and both are better off than Ruby programmers (84k). If you really want the dollars, ocaml is apparently where its at (149k)
http://www.indeed.com/salary?q1=cobol+programmer&l1=&tm=1 http://www.indeed.com/salary?q1=cobol+programmer&l1=&...
http://www.indeed.com/salary?q1=java+programmer&l1=&tm=1 http://www.indeed.com/salary?q1=java+programmer&l1=&...
http://www.indeed.com/salary?q1=ruby+programmer&l1=&tm=1 http://www.indeed.com/salary?q1=ruby+programmer&l1=&...
http://www.indeed.com/salary?q1=ocaml+programmer&l1= http://www.indeed.com/salary?q1=ocaml+programmer&l1=
Caveat: clearly this isn't science, and i don't know how the sites keywords work. might be way off base.
- IHaveASolution 16y agoOCaml is getting that much money from quantitative finance firms &c. if you are curious. There are a not insignificant number of them that use OCaml, and it is the only time I have heard of OCaml being used.
- mhd 16y agoAPL programmer (rarely used outside finance, too) gets you 94 kilobucks. I guess the OCaml average contains very few samples.
- Bigendian 16y agoOCaml is used for code verification tools too (Microsoft z3, CEA Frama-C, INRIA Coq, AbsInt Astree, Facebook pfff, ...) and for system programming a lot (Citrix Xen Toolstack, MLstate OPA, MyLife.com, MLdonkey, Unison, ...). If you have heard of OCaml only for finance, you have probably not searched enough.