3 ms·
It's either a one-time investment, or a permanent loss of a (perhaps small) part of your users. Perhaps it doesn't make sense for the LA Times, but I'm wonderi
by akie 8y ago
It's either a one-time investment, or a permanent loss of a (perhaps small) part of your users.
Perhaps it doesn't make sense for the LA Times, but I'm wondering how large the investment really is and whether or not it would start getting worth it if you look at (say) 3 or 5 year periods.
- JumpCrisscross 8y ago> whether or not it would start getting worth it if you look at (say) 3 or 5 year periods It's a market targeting and opportunity cost question. Yes, many of Apple's consumers are probably high-priced wine consumers. And yes, winemaking is a profitable business. That doesn't mean, however, that Apple serves its interests by expanding into wine. It's promising, though, that we now have data showing psychotic targeting practices are unnecessary. Perhaps, even inefficient.
- sah2ed 8y ago> It's promising, though, that we now have data showing [psychotic] targeting practices are unnecessary. Perhaps, even inefficient. Perhaps you meant psychographic?