3 ms·
To the ex-employee. There was no conclusion drawn as to the involvement of the gifted kid other than the pi initially being set up by them.
by tapland 8y ago
To the ex-employee.
There was no conclusion drawn as to the involvement of the gifted kid other than the pi initially being set up by them.
- mirimir 8y agoYeah, but it was the setup that included all that information about him. That's why I said "F". An OPSEC fail. For the ex-employee, it was failure in judgment. And also OPSEC failure, for not checking the device for compromising information.