>It’s an objectively bad car. How is it an objectively bad car? Have you driven it? All the early impressions are quite positive and you can argue however you

>It’s an objectively bad car. How is it an objectively bad car? Have you driven it? All the early impressions are quite positive and you can argue however you want it not being a Supra (it's also much cheaper than the old A80), but you literally cannot call it objectively bad without actually mentioning why. It looks good inside out, is priced reasonably, seems to have a good chassis tuning and is fairly quick with a great engine, so what's wrong with it?