> The argument that "you trusted this server enough to connect to it and download a file, therefore you clearly should trust it enough to permit it to execute a

> The argument that "you trusted this server enough to connect to it and download a file, therefore you clearly should trust it enough to permit it to execute arbitrary executables on your machine" is false in both cases. Nicely put. This feels like yet another variant of the same confusion we see around web browsing, with people saying "oh, if you don't want a virus don't go to sketchy sites". Agreeing to receive HTML or even run unfamiliar Javascript in a browser shouldn't be equated with trusting that website to run anything outside the sandbox, and in a world where ads on major sites are frequently resold through a half-dozen shoddy networks it's an important distinction.